Welcome to roadsat.com on July 11 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces

WikiProject History

The Assessment department finds historical articles for the first time and rate them on quality and importance scales.

The articles are rated by examining them and comparing them to the quality and importance scales. A template is then place on the article's talk page stating that the article is within the scope of WikiProject History and displaying what rating the article has been given].

Historical articles can be found in Category:History and its subcategories

Progress
History
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 3 4 111 118
Featured list FL 3 3
A-Class article A 1 1
Good article GA 2 2 9 10 146 169
B 20 21 30 18 647 736
C 7 16 20 13 219 275
Start 12 26 46 80 2355 2519
Stub 1 5 14 53 2809 2882
List 4 59 1 26 90
Assessed 42 74 181 179 6317 6793
Unassessed 2 6 3 3 6809 6823
Total 44 80 184 182 13126 13616

[edit] Template

WikiProject History  
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Unrated ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[edit] Usage

[edit] Usage

The following is the full syntax used for placing this template on a talk page:

{{WikiProject History
|small=
|class=
|importance=
|Attention= 
|A-Class=
|peer-review=
|old-peer-review=
<!-- B-Class checklist -->
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all 
major points are appropriately cited. -->
|B-Class-1=
<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and 
does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->
|B-Class-2=
<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including 
a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
|B-Class-3=
<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
|B-Class-4=
<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, 
such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|B-Class-5=
<!-- 6. It is written from a neutral point of view. -->
|B-Class-6=
<!-- Task forces -->
}}

General parameters:

  • small – "yes" if the banner should be rendered in its miniature size; this should be used sparingly and only on crowded talk pages for the time being.
  • class – a rating of the article's quality; see the quality scale for more details.
  • importance - a rating of the article's quality; see the importance scale for more details.
  • Attention – "yes" if the article is extremely low quality and requires the attention of experienced editors.
  • A-Classcurrent/pass/fail
  • peer-review – "yes"
  • old-peer-review – "yes"

B-Class checklist (available only for articles rated as "Stub-Class", "Start-Class", or "B-Class":


Contents

[edit] Quality scale

[edit] Featured articles

Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review

Featured articles are selected at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates

[edit] A-Class

Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written.

A-Class articles are selected by the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review#A-Class Review.

[edit] Good articles

Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.

Good articles are selected at Wikipedia:Good article nominations.

[edit] B-Class

The article meets the following six criteria:

  1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.
  2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
  3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
  4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
  5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
  6. It is written from a neutral point of view

B-Class articles are selected by individual assessors.

[edit] Start Class

Start class article have a few paragraphs that provide all the key points but may not cover all aspects of the subject. These articles usually have an image or infobox to support the text.

Start-class articles are selected by individual assessors.

[edit] Stub Class

Stubs are very short articles which offer a quick description of the subject

Stub articles are selected by individual assessors

[edit] Importance scale

Need The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality
Top Subject is a must-have for a good encyclopedia
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid Subject fills in more minor details
Low Subject is mainly of specialist interest.
Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs