Welcome to roadsat.com on July 9 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

User talk:Robert Waalk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Maximusveritas 02:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean by "rating"? I can go through and make additional edits. One major thing is that you don't want to talk in 1st person, such as the "Bibliography" section in the Gus Wingfield page. Maximusveritas 03:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Are you sure you want to have the articles rated? I don't think it's neccesary at this point. That's usually only for articles that have been around for a long time and want to be considered for Featured Article status. You should probably try to do some more work on the articles before that. One thing you could try to do is add more citations. This page can help you with that. -Maximusveritas 03:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I think that's a good decision. The articles you've written are pretty good as is, so moving on to new articles is the way to go. Maximusveritas 15:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

If you would like to insert an image and it hasn't already been uploaded by someone else, you would need to upload a suitable image yourself and then link to it. I don't have much experience with that myself, but you can read about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents/Images_and_media The simplest way to do the template would be to copy one from a related topic. Template:U.S. State Attorneys General would be a good one to look at. I'll go ahead and do that for you, but you'll need to fill in the correct names for each state. Maximusveritas 17:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC) I put the template in Template:U.S. State Auditors instead of Template:State Auditors. Maximusveritas 17:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Projects

[edit] User_talk:BrownHairedGirl#WP:BIO

Hello, I put {} around the db and prod templates in order to de-tag the talk page for deletion. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 22:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

[edit] Brownhairedgirl

Robert you were repeatedly informed by Brownhairedgirl that any further posting on her talk page would not be welcome at all. Taking this into account would you please remove your posting from the page. Thank you - Galloglass 22:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

That was nearly a year ago. I merely wanted to contact her in order to discuss some things with her and settle whatever problems may have develped between us. And, I do wish you wouldn't mess with my talk page. Things that were deleted were deleted because I did not want to see them every time I came on.--Robert Waalk (talk) 00:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
And, I was not repeatedly asked, I was asked once, and I obliged. I only do so now to get in contact.
If you recall Robert, BrownHairedGirl posted a number of times on her own page in reply to your posts for you to stop posting there as well as the request here. So I ask you again, can you please comply with these requests. - Galloglass 07:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Can you tell me what other way I may contact her?
Thanks Robert. I think this is the best way to proceed. - Galloglass 18:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
May you offer me someway that I could still contact her when she returns? I do need to talk to her, a polite discussion, and I wish to bury any hatchet and get things worked out between her and the gerontology people before I return to that group.--Robert Waalk (talk) 18:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of "Jim Wood (Arkansas)"

A page you created, Jim Wood (Arkansas), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Miquonranger03 (talk) 02:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

I have fixed it, you caught me in the middle of writing the biography that made him important.--Robert Waalk (talk) 05:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of James Hebert "Jimmie Red" Jones

A tag has been placed on James Hebert "Jimmie Red" Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 19:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Nancy Hall

A tag has been placed on Nancy Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. roleplayer 21:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Julia Hughes Jones

A tag has been placed on Julia Hughes Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 21:46, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to the Novels WikiProject

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

Thanks for all your help with the Novels Collaboration of the Month. Much appreciated. Liveste (talkedits) 03:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Books.jpg

Hi, thanks for uploading that book cover, but you had overwritten a previously existing image with your upload, as result that cover featured on Boris Zubry as this guy's portrait:) I've fixed it for you by reuploading it as Image:Thomas Wolfe - Look Homeward, Angel.jpg and updating the article. Next time please don't ignore warnings the system displays during uploads, choosing more descriptive names for images also helps to avoid confusion. And by the way, happy editing! MaxSem(Han shot first!) 13:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Look Homeward Angel - Pogledaj dom svoj andjele

Bio je to prvi, pravi povratak u istoriji jugoslovenskog roka i to najviše zahvaljujući pesmi "Pogledaj dom svoj anđele", koja je tako nazvana po romanu američkog pisca Tomasa Volfa. (Translation: It was the first real comeback in the history of Yugoslav rock, mostly because of the song Look Homeward Angel named after a novel by the American writer Thomas Wolfe.)--EX YU ROCK enciklopedija 1960-2006 (Ex YU Rock Encyclopedia 1960-2006 or Encyclopedia of former Yugoslav Rock 1960-2006), Janjatović Petar; ISBN 978-86-905317-1-4, page 173;
Međutim, potpuno ih je ućutkala pesma "Pogledaj dom svoj anđele" nazvana tako po romanu Tomasa Volfa, a objavljena i u prvoj zbrici pesama Bore Đorđevića pod nazivom "Ravnodušan prema plaču". (Translation: But they were silenced by the song Look Homeward Angel, named so after the Thomas Wolfe's novel, and previously published in Bora Đorđević's first book of poems Listless Towards Crying.--Riblja čorba, Jakovljević Mirko; ISBN 86-83525-39-2, page 60.
This is only something from the two books I own, and I'm quite aware I'll have to find some text on the internet to support theese claims, I just wanted to show to you you're mistaking saying the song probably wasn't named after the novel... I agree with you that the information about Pogledaj, dom svoj anđele being named after Wolfe's novel Look Homeward Angel seems trivial, and in fact the song with its apocalyptical lyrics has nothing in common with the novel except the title, but that information was placed inside the article in the Influences section while the article was still too short. I'm not quite sure if the information should be inside the Look Homeward Angel article, if you think it shouldn't it's Ok with me... And I believe the novel WAS translated into other languages, including Serbian (the translation Pogledaj dom svoj anđele being little unusual, archaic...). Oh, and I just want to know: what did you mean when you wrote that you're "certain it's never been on the shelfs in Serbia"? The fact you're a native speaker of English indicates you don't know much about Serbia, so I think I can guess what you meant... And if it is so, your statement offended me. Ostalocutanje (talk)
I merely did not think that the novel, rather obscure today, had actually been translated into Serbian, which is not a major language.
Ok, ok, understood... It's just that the way you said it, made it sound... well, you know... Ostalocutanje (talk)

[edit] The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - October 2008

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reliable sources

You wrote at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Assessment:

How is book rags not a credible source? I realize its not free for everyone but it is a college lit. study guide seller. There's a double-edge here on wikipedia, everybody wants everything sourced to death, yet no individual knowledge or reserach can be used unless its sourced, (as if a second individual automatically makes everything true), and on these obscure novels and projects normally nothing can be done because the information just does not exist on the web or files of online resources. I don't think you can have such a high standard, but still, book rags is credible, the review is some 20,000 words long and its written by college professors. I think you should take what you can get on these books because some information is better than no informationand its still validated. Its probably the only possible source in existence that I could a thorough and succinct plot review to summarize for purposes of an encylopedia article, since unlike a real encyclopedia, especially a literature one, their can be no individual research or opinion here.--Robert Waalk (talk) 00:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Bookrags.com is not a reliable source as per WP:RS. "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." It may be possible to find reliable sources through Bookrags, but the site itself is a landmine of uncited claims, non-expert original research, and unchecked facts. It has been shot down by Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard more than once. Plot summaries do not technically require citations because the obvious source for an article about a novel is the novel itself. Possible sources may include reviews from established publications (New York Times book reviews, for example) or interviews with the author(s) by a media syndication. Don't think you have to rely on Bookrags, Sparknotes, Enotes, or other refuges for desperate high school students! An encyclopedic article should rely on the most reputable of sources, not the easiest to access. I hope this helps, María (habla conmigo) 00:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

From just a quick Google Books, I found many critical collections, biographies, etc, that mention the novel:
Also check out your local library, or closest university library; mine has 20+ books that popped up with a simple search for the title. Sometimes the best sources are the ones you have to hunt for, but this novel seems to have fairly good coverage. María (habla conmigo) 01:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
well thanks for your help.
Your welcome. I don't know what you mean re: "wikidesk", however. María (habla conmigo) 02:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
You could ask Kevin, but from what I gather it's just a subpage. See WP:USER for info on creating subpages. María (habla conmigo) 00:28, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Danke.

[edit] Steppenwolf Picture

debate moved to the novels General Forum. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 06:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Onitsha (novel)

You're welcome, although quite a bit of work is still needed. I saw that you added Category:Translations after my edit; this is incorrect, as the article is not about the English translation, it's about the novel itself. If you click on the link to the category, you will see that it is for articles solely about translations, and does not include books that happen to have been translated. The information in the infobox (including the image and publication details) should also reflect the novel's first edition, not the translation. I understand that it's confusing, as this is the English Wikipedia and all, but original editions are inherently more notable, as is their initial publication. I hope this helps, María (habla conmigo) 15:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Novels Collaboration of the Month

You supported The Tin Drum, which has been selected as the Novels WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article towards featured article standard. Alan16 (talk) 23:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Novels Newsletter - June 2009

[edit] WikiProject Novels - Coordinator Election

Hello. To begin, every member of WikiProject Novels will be getting this message (the joy of macros) so if you wish to get in touch with me, please post a message on my talk page. I would encourage anyone who so wishes, to stand in the Coordinator Elections. If you wish to stand, please do so by 23:59pm, June 27. Voting will the continue to 23:59pm, July 21. Can everyone please check-out the Coordinator Elections page. Also, the collaboration of the month is The Tin Drum, so if you have any spare time, please check it out. And I apologise to the seven of you for whom this will be a repeat message. Regards, Alan16 (talk).

[edit] Coordinator Election

Hello. The Coordiantor Election has begun. All members are encouraged to vote by the deadline, July 28. To vote simply add support to the comments and questions for.. section of the member of your choice.

3 users are standing:

Regards, Alan16 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC).

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs