Welcome to roadsat.com on July 11 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

User talk:JRSpriggs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from User:JRSpriggs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost
Pointers:
Category:Ordinal numbers, Category:Cardinal numbers, Category:Set theory, Category:Root-finding algorithms, Category:Proof theory, Category:Mathematical logic, Category:General relativity, Category:Hyperbolic geometry, Category:Go

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Relativity, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga

User_talk:Oleg Alexandrov, User_talk:Jitse Niesen, User_talk:Trovatore, User_talk:Arthur Rubin, User_talk:CBM, User_talk:Piandcompany

ordinal number, ordinal arithmetic, large countable ordinal, ordinal notation, User:JRSpriggs/Ordinal notation

Constructible universe, implicational propositional calculus, harmonic coordinate condition, Noether's theorem, User:JRSpriggs/Optimal monetary policy, User:JRSpriggs/Ani-Monday

Need work:
Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime, Electromagnetic stress-energy tensor

Resources:

Archives:

Contents

[edit] quadrilaterals

You have new messages
Hello, JRSpriggs. You have new messages at Nbarth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

[edit] Relativistic electromagnetism conventions

Hi JRSpriggs, I think I remember that you (unlike me) have gone through the effort of working the sign and other conventions associated with the electromagnetic tensor. If you get a chance, you should check these edits, and undo the incorrect ones, which I think is all of them.

Thanks! :-) --Steve (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

I undid the changes to Electromagnetic tensor and Covariant formulation of classical electromagnetism which render those matrices inconsistent with the rest of the articles. You should look more closely at Moving magnet and conductor problem which may require a different kind of change. I no longer want to work on the electromagnetic articles — it is too much work and not appreciated. There are too many conflicting conventions. JRSpriggs (talk) 20:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Haha, as you can tell I don't want to work on them either! Sorry to bother you. Moving magnet and conductor problem is a royal mess of an article on a very obscure topic...not worth thinking about or correcting IMO. --Steve (talk) 04:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] GA Reassessment of Special relativity

I have done a GA Reassessment of the Special relativity article as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article to need quite a bit of referencing. I have placed the article on hold for a week pending work. I am notifying you, as the primary editor, of this review which can be found here. If there are any questions please contact me on my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Cross posting

Sorry. I didn't know Wikipedia had a policy against this. And yes, I feel like an idiot, now. Ti-30X (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Subprime Mortgage Crisis

Hello JRSpriggs, I reverted your edit and requested more specific information as to who exactly in Washington the Republican study was admonishing. I left a message on the talk page concerning my revert. Take care. Scribner (talk) 18:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs