Talk:Black's Law Dictionary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Law	(Rated Start-Class, Low-importance)	LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlegal articles
Law portal v • d • e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.  Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.  Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contents 1 44th Most Popular Page, Needs EXPANSION 2 Yahoo! 3 Update 4 2nd Ed. Search 5 3.1, "Some online legal dictionaries" 6 Software 7 Hoax?

[edit] 44th Most Popular Page, Needs EXPANSION

This page is the 44th most popular page in Wikipedia. It really needs more content. I however, am only in a position to complain, unfortunately. Aldie 13:23 Oct 24, 2002 (UTC) If justice is defined as the fair, impartial consideration of opposing interests,are law opposing interests, are law and justice the same thing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.237.146 (talk) 00:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yahoo!

it shows up right away on Yahoo!! =]

[edit] Update

Weaved a bit in, reporting an online critique.

[edit] 2nd Ed. Search

Can someone please find an online version of the 2nd edition? True 15:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3.1, "Some online legal dictionaries"

Is section 3.1, "Some online legal dictionaries," appropriate content for the Black's Law Dictionary page? Wouldn't it be better suited for the generic Law Dictionary page?

Actually, that's rhetorical, I'm just going to move it. I will, however, add a "See Also" section. For now, only the "Law Dictionary" page will be included, but I would appreciate it if others would help expand it. 24.175.54.43 15:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Software

Black's Law Dictionary is now available in a software format. -- Toytoy 19:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hoax?

Shouldnt we put how it was founded as a hoax? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.107.16.114 (talk) 03:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

According to this contemporaneous UseNet post, the hoax claim in 2003 is a hoax: http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/874d0f4dccfda18e —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.225.104.198 (talk) 18:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)