Polluter pays principle

	Environmental law
	Theory
	Earth jurisprudence; Intergenerational equity; Polluter pays principle; Precautionary principle; Public trust doctrine; Sustainable development
	Specific issues
	Asbestos; Brownfield land; Illegal logging; Poaching · Unlawful fishing; Mitigation of global warming; International environmental law; Wildlife Enforcement Monitoring System; War and environmental law
	Instruments of Environmental policy
	Ecotax · Market-based instruments; Environmental impact assessment;
	v • d • e

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In environmental law, the polluter pays principle is enacted to make the party responsible for producing pollution responsible for paying for the damage done to the natural environment. It is regarded as a regional custom because of the strong support it has received in most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and European Community (EC) countries. In international environmental law it is mentioned in Principle 16 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.

The polluter pays principle underpins environmental policy such as an ecotax, which, if enacted by government, deters and essentially reduces the emitting of greenhouse gas emissions. Some eco-taxes underpinned by the polluter pays principle include: the Gas Guzzler Tax, in US, Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)- a "polluter pays" fine.

Polluter pays is also known as extended polluter responsibility (EPR). This is a concept that was probably first described by the Swedish government in 1975. EPR seeks to shift the responsibility dealing with waste from governments (and thus, taxpayers and society at large) to the entities producing it. In effect, it internalises the cost of waste disposal into the cost of the product, theoretically meaning that the producers will improve the waste profile of their products, thus decreasing waste and increasing possibilities for reuse and recycling.

OECD defines EPR as:

a concept where manufacturers and importers of products should bear a significant degree of responsibility for the environmental impacts of their products throughout the product life-cycle, including upstream impacts inherent in the selection of materials for the products, impacts from manufacturers’ production process itself, and downstream impacts from the use and disposal of the products. Producers accept their responsibility when designing their products to minimise life-cycle environmental impacts, and when accepting legal, physical or socio-economic responsibility for environmental impacts that cannot be eliminated by design.^[1]

[edit] References

^ OECD factsheet about EPR: http://www.oecd.org/document/53/0,3343,en_2649_34395_37284725_1_1_1_1,00.html

International Law and Naval War: The Effect of Marine Safety and Pollution Conventions during International Armed Conflict, by Dr. Sonja Ann Jozef Boelaert-Suominen (December 2000). http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/npapers/np15/NewportPaperNo15.pdf
Doswald-Beck, ICRC Review (1997), No. 316, 35–55; Greenwood, ibid., 65–75.