Joint custody
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Joint custody is a court order whereby custody of a child is awarded to both parties. In joint custody both parents are "custodial parents" and neither parent is a non-custodial parents, or in other words the child has two custodial parents.
Many states recognize two forms of joint custody: joint physical custody, and joint legal custody. In joint legal custody, both parents share the ability to have access to educational, health, and other records, and have equal decision-making status where the welfare of the child is concerned.
In joint physical custody, which is also known as joint physical care, actual lodging and care of the child is shared according to a court-ordered custody schedule (also known as a "parenting plan" or "parenting schedule"). In many cases, the term 'visitation' is no longer used in these circumstances, but rather is reserved to sole custody orders. In some states joint physical custody creates a presumption of equal shared parenting, however in most states, joint physical custody creates an obligation to provide each of the parents with "significant periods" of physical custody so as to assure the child of "frequent and continuing contact" with both parents.[1] Courts have not clearly defined what "significant periods" and "frequent and continuous contact" mean, which requires parents to litigate to find out.
It is important to note that joint physical custody and joint legal custody are different aspects of custody, and determination is often made separately in many states' divorce courts. E.g., it is possible to have joint legal custody, but for one parent to have sole physical custody In some states this is referred to as Custodial Parent and Non-Custodial Parent.
Also, where there is joint physical custody, terms of art such as "primary custodial parent" and "primary residence" have no legal meaning other than for determining tax status, and both parents are still custodial parents.[2]
Contents |
[edit] Notes
- ^ See e.g., Cal. Fam. Code sect. 3004 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=fam&group=02001-03000&file=3000-3007
- ^ See e.g., In re Marriage of Rose and Richardson (App. 2 Dist. 2002) 126 Cal.App.4th 941. Moreover, several courts have also stated, "The term `primary physical custody' has no legal meaning." (In re Marriage of Biallas (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 755, 759 citing Brody, Whealon, and Ruisi; see also In re Marriage of Richardson, 102 Cal.App.4th 941, 945, fn. 2; In re Marriage of Lasich (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 702, 714
[edit] See also
| The length of this "see also" section may adversely affect readability. Please ensure that the "see also" links are not mentioned elsewhere in the article, are not red links, are as few in number and as relevant as possible. |
- Child abduction
- Child custody
- Child custody laws in the United States
- Child support
- Child support by country
- Child support in the United States
- Custodial parent
- Deadbeat parent
- Divorce
- Family law
- Family court
- Family Court of Australia
- Fathers' rights
- Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
- Joint custody
- Joint physical custody
- Judgment of Solomon
- Legal custody
- Men's movement
- Men's rights
- Mothers' rights
- Non-custodial parent
- Noncustodial parent
- Parenting plan
- Paternity
- Physical custody
- Residence in English law
- Shared parenting
- Shared residency in English law
- Sole physical custody
- Parental alienation syndrome
- Stepchildren of the state
- Women's movement
- Women's rights

