Generalization (logic)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematical logic, generalization (also universal generalization, GEN) is an inference rule of predicate calculus. It states that if
has been derived, then
can be derived.
[edit] Generalization with hypotheses
The full generalization rule allows for hypotheses to the left of the turnstile, but with restrictions. Assume Γ is a set of formulas, φ a formula, and
has been derived. The generalization rule states that
can be derived if y is not mentioned in Γ and x does not occur in φ.
These restrictions are necessary for soundness. Without the first restriction, one could conclude
from the hypothesis P(y). Without the second restriction, one could make the following deduction:
(Hypothesis)
(Existential instantiation)
(Existential instantiaion)
(Faulty universal generalization)
This purports to show that
which is an unsound deduction.
[edit] Example of a proof
Prove:
.
Proof:
| Number | Formula | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() |
Hypothesis |
| 2 | ![]() |
Hypothesis |
| 3 | ![]() |
Axiom PRED-1 |
| 4 | ![]() |
From (1) and (3) by Modus Ponens |
| 5 | ![]() |
Axiom PRED-1 |
| 6 | ![]() |
From (2) and (5) by Modus Ponens |
| 7 | ![]() |
From (6) and (4) by Modus Ponens |
| 8 | ![]() |
From (7) by Generalization |
| 9 | ![]() |
Summary of (1) through (8) |
| 10 | ![]() |
From (9) by Deduction Theorem |
| 11 | ![]() |
From (10) by Deduction Theorem |
In this proof, the deduction theorem was applicable in steps 10 and 11 because the formulas being moved have no free variables.
[edit] See also
- First-order logic
- Universal instantiation
- Hasty generalization
- Generalization error
- Categorical imperative redirected from "Generalization in Ethics"
- Generalizations of Fibonacci numbers
- Generalizations of Pauli matrices
- Derivative (generalizations)












