Welcome to roadsat.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Generalization (logic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematical logic, generalization (also universal generalization, GEN) is an inference rule of predicate calculus. It states that if  \vdash P(x) has been derived, then  \vdash \forall x \, P(x) can be derived.

[edit] Generalization with hypotheses

The full generalization rule allows for hypotheses to the left of the turnstile, but with restrictions. Assume Γ is a set of formulas, φ a formula, and \Gamma \vdash \phi(y) has been derived. The generalization rule states that \Gamma \vdash \forall x \phi(x) can be derived if y is not mentioned in Γ and x does not occur in φ.

These restrictions are necessary for soundness. Without the first restriction, one could conclude \forall x P(x) from the hypothesis P(y). Without the second restriction, one could make the following deduction:

  1. \exists z \exists w ( z \not = w) (Hypothesis)
  2. \exists w (y \not = w) (Existential instantiation)
  3. y \not = x (Existential instantiaion)
  4. \forall x (x \not = x) (Faulty universal generalization)

This purports to show that \exists z \exists w ( z \not = w) \vdash \forall x (x \not = x), which is an unsound deduction.

[edit] Example of a proof

Prove:  \forall x \, (P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)) \rightarrow (\forall x \, P(x) \rightarrow \forall x \, Q(x)) .

Proof:

Number Formula Justification
1  \forall x \, (P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)) Hypothesis
2  \forall x \, P(x) Hypothesis
3  (\forall x \, (P(x) \rightarrow Q(x))) \rightarrow (P(y) \rightarrow Q(y)))  Axiom PRED-1
4  P(y) \rightarrow Q(y) From (1) and (3) by Modus Ponens
5  (\forall x \, P(x)) \rightarrow P(y) Axiom PRED-1
6  P(y) \ From (2) and (5) by Modus Ponens
7  Q(y) \ From (6) and (4) by Modus Ponens
8  \forall x \, Q(x) From (7) by Generalization
9  \forall x \, (P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)), \forall x \, P(x) \vdash \forall x \, Q(x) Summary of (1) through (8)
10  \forall x \, (P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)) \vdash \forall x \, P(x) \rightarrow \forall x \, Q(x) From (9) by Deduction Theorem
11  \vdash \forall x \, (P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)) \rightarrow (\forall x \, P(x) \rightarrow \forall x \, Q(x)) From (10) by Deduction Theorem

In this proof, the deduction theorem was applicable in steps 10 and 11 because the formulas being moved have no free variables.

[edit] See also

Personal tools
Languages

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs